I didn't have a problem with the call.
You need to be objective. On second thought that ain't going to happen any time soon.You need new glasses
That call won't be the reason LSU loses to Bama. Maybe the 9th version of the O line will be more important. If we can't move the ball against St. we won't move the ball against Bama.The SEC has all but ensured Bama stays undefeated. The lengths this league and CFB as a whole will go to to keep their cash cow competing for NC's is astounding. Targeting? Fuh'kin puh'lease… White hit Fitz with his hands, pushed him down. Total bullshit.
You need to be objective. On second thought that ain't going to happen any time soon.
You need to remove your purple & gold glasses. On second thought, you are incapable of seeing anything objectively.You need new glasses
yes it does. thanks for that. and I went to see a star is born last night. so now i have to cry two nights in a row. thanks dachsie.
there was a helmet to helmet touch. Just a touch. The SEC front office will justify the call.
Looks like you & I are the only two that think so.It was a legit call..
If your question was directed to me, I didn't see the play.if that was targeting explain why in the Alabama Tennessee game a targeting call was overturned when there was a clear lunge and helmet to helmet contact?